Million, they'd need to keep the budget under $100Īlthough, without "Marvel" or "DC" producing, I don't know if audiences would automatically buy into the film as it lacks "brand value." Yes, it's "original" in that it's not adapted from anything, which many Redditors claim to seek - but what about original superhero films? Unbreakable had a mediocre performance, while Chronicle was a success.Īs to whether you prefer English subtitles instead of English voiceovers/dubbing, it doesn't seem like they'll be having that option, at least not in theaters. To me, if it were American-made and in English, I think it would be a moderate success, like $300 million worldwide, depending on the budget (at $300 Fantastic comparison, which is the biggest stretch (pun intended, sorry).īut anyway, what are your thoughts? If you're a comic book/superhero film fan, will you go see it? Yes, these comparisons are a stretch other than the Invisible Woman, especially the Mr.
They have the Bear, who is the "muscle" (like Ben Grimm/the Thing), a woman who can make herself invisible (Sue Storm/Invisible Woman), a guy who seemingly moves at super speed (Johnny Storm/Human Torch), and a guy who can transmute his limbs into rocks as well as have telekinetic powers with rocks (Reed Richards/Mr. It would probably be a bit unfair to say that they "copied" Marvel by having a film similar to The Avengers, as the composition of the team is different from Marvel's "Big Four." They have a superhero who can mutate into a huge bear - like Bruce Banner turning into the Hulk - which is as close to an Avenger on their team.įrom what it looks closer to "The Russian Fantastic Four" than the "Russian Avengers." Although, they'd probably aim for the Avengers comparison given the three F4 performances in the last 12 years. Obviously, the dialogue is all Russian, but they've added English dubs over so that you only hear the dialogue in English 1